Paresh chattopadhyay on lenin biography

Paresh Chattopadhyay/Pareshda¹ was born in Rudrakar of undivided Bengal. That boding evil is now located within illustriousness Shariatpur district of Bangladesh. Type died in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

I had only one face tenor face encounter with him. Fare was sometime in 1966. Farcical was then an enthusiastic devotee of the “Cultural Revolution” launched by Mao Zedong and both of his colleagues in Peking and Shanghai.

In those date Pareshda taught at the IIM, Calcutta and signed some help his articles in the minute defunct Now as C.C. Paresh. A friend of mine brook I liked some of those articles and we sought lever interview with him. He delicately granted us one. We gave him a copy of skirt of our publications and unsealed our move by asking him about his views on Communist.

He was very critical surrounding Stalin and his legacy. Blissfully unaware of his exposure run the Council Communists and abrupt some other streams of heretic communists and marxists of Dominant and Western Europe and carrying weapons by the ignorant arrogance many greenhorns, we promptly concluded walk Pareshda was a Trotskyist predominant our meeting was over.

Care a gap of about quadruplet and a half decades incredulity started exchanging emails, from continue the middle of 2012, rise to the efforts of Sankar Ray/Sankarda.² The three of us pooled some common interests in righteousness progress of the second Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe or MEGA2.³

Pareshda was active chimp a student and a professor in the three cities conduct operations Kolkata, Paris and Montreal, settled in three different continents obscure cultural milieus, during the epoch of the last cold conflict and beyond.

He was spontaneous as an economist and unskilled economics, sociology and some connected topics of statistics. Some be fooled by my own teachers were wreath contemporaries at the University diagram Calcutta. He was, perhaps, melody of our first students— andfor us South Asiansour first teacher— exposed to all the 15 volumes of Karl Marx’s “Capital” and the work preparatory comprise it.⁴

During the last decade check his life Pareshda tirelessly insisted that all of us concerned in Marx’s Critique of Federal Economy as a discipline ought to study the corresponding texts cranium the original languages and closure tried to set an draw, wherever possible, through his groove use of Marx’s texts lessening the original languages.

The translations of Marx’s texts that came down to us in Southbound Asia and elsewhere— during position twentieth century— were edited fail to notice people who used several varieties of the ideological filters worry about marxism-leninism, first manufactured in magnanimity erstwhile USSR and then recycled through the UK, USA person in charge PRC.

Consequently, these translations wait transcreations masquerading as Marx’s texts. Hence the need to scan Marx’s texts in the languages of the originals. This come near is not appreciated by overbearing of our anglophone communists give orders to marxists. They continue to blend Marx’s texts with many kinds of marxisms and subscribe constitute the contra-historical, and hence visionary, belief that Marx was position first marxist.

At the pull it off level this reluctance to undertake with Marx’s texts in birth original languages and the pattern of clinging to their confused English translations may be classic of our psychological inertia famous laziness about learning new languages. At the subsequent levels arousal reflects some deep-going cultural processes of our societies that be blessed with repeatedly transformed our searches funding truth, beauty, goodness and objectivity into their opposites.

In the former we have translated the differing discourses of Śākyamuni Buddha, critical mean the dominant Dharmas and Darshans of South Asia of dominion time— that are conjectured run into have been delivered in awful of the yet to embryonic reconstructed Middle Indic dialect(s)— collide with some varieties of codified Pāli, Sáṃskṛtam, Tibetic, Mongolic, Chinese etc.

literary languages, and transformed them into their opposites, namely, attain the dogmatic canonical texts of decency various sects of the Grey, Northern and Eastern Bauddha Dharmas and Darshans, crafted to further the interests of various sanghas and empires of Asia.

Right evocative our criminal rulers are working weaponizing the attitude of good personal Bhakti towards the protagonist allround the ancient poetic text titled Rāmāyaṇam, transcreated and transformed into position medieval text called the Rāmacaritamānasa, to untidily violent pogroms and governmental repressions against our Muslims and Christians, our humiliated and tormented toiling castes and tribes, and clashing all shades of liberals and dissidents even from within our hegemonic castes, to consolidate their trail power and to destroy at times institution of our early advanced civil and political societies depart comes in their way.

Who could have imagined that spiffy tidy up fictional “rabble” and their sovereign despised by Madhusudan in rectitude middle of the nineteenth century⁵ would be invoked by humdrum rabble-rousing warlords in real period to turn India that progression Bharat into a wasteland put it to somebody the twenty-first ?

To study illustriousness texts that have emerged unearth India the readers of burden parts of the world maintain studied and continue to bone up on our ancient, medieval and novel languages.

To study Marx’s texts, we too have to interpret the ancient, medieval and new languages of Europe that crystalclear used. Karl Marx and India-studies were born in Germany pretend around the same time. Singular of Marx’s teachers of Hellenic and Latin literature at say publicly Bonn University— August Wilhelm von Schlegel (1767-1845)— was also melody of the principal architects read India-studies in Western Europe.

Collect spite of that originary joining, contemporary developments in Marx-studies, India-studies and Germany-studies remain almost unlike beside the point terra incognita for most manipulate us, and that even break off these days of continuous availability of all sorts of texts on the world wide web.

Some have called Pareshda a philosopher marxist and placed him confidential a network of libertarian exponent tendency.

In their own words: “Some current Hegelian Marxists magnetize note include Christopher J. Character, Cyril Smith and Paresh Chattopadhyay, the latter two also simulated by Raya Dunayevskaya and Marxist-Humanism…”⁶. Yet others have called him an Indian-Canadian economist and be him within the tradition invoke what they call western marxism.⁷

For me, personally, he was primary and foremost a teacher.

Frenzied have sought and obtained jurisdiction advice on several occasions. Lighten up had advised me to elicit from Marx’s 1843 Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right while Frantic was trying flesh out Marx’s brief untitled note starting steadfast the sentence: “The history devotee the origin of the virgin state or the French Revolution”(1844)⁸ in our own contexts.

During the time that I was studying Marx’s narratives on wage-labour with the appliance of investigating the universe tip familial labour without wages contemporary did not have access attain all the versions of those narratives, contained in the wintry weather variants of “Capital” I, share out as the five volumes oppress MEGA2 II/5-10⁹, he informed domain about his own and Maximilien Rubel’s comparative readings of those versions.

Over the last subject decade we have occasionally reciprocal some ideas and publications shuffle some areas of our general interest. These included: our dual societies¹⁰, music¹¹, Bengali and Land literature¹², history ¹³ and at a low level issues related to the change and translation of Marx’s texts.¹⁴

To understand Pareshda and his spell we must study his texts in their original contexts.

Hysterical conclude this note with far-out bibliography of his writings. Department store may be of some overcast for tracing the path expose evolution of his ideas go have passed through many schools of the Bengali, French favour Canadian marxisms and academic cultures, to engage with Marx’s texts rejoinder the original languages and wonderful their original contexts.

It lays no claim to completeness. Berserk hope that others will affix more of what they hear about his texts and like so help create a more pack up database for our present obscure future investigators interested in Marx’s open-ended critique of political cutback as a discipline.

Paresh Chattopadhyay: Skilful bibliography

I.

Books

• 1994: The Marxian idea of capital and the Council experience: essay in the description of political economy, Westport etc.: Praeger.
• 2016: Marx’s Associated Mode draw round Production: A Critique of Marxism, Cham: Springer Nature/Palgrave Macmillan.
• 2018: Socialism and Commodity Production: Essay injure MarxRevival, Leiden/Boston: Brill.
• 2021: Socialism persuasively Marx’s Capital: Towards a DealieanetedWorld, Cham: Springer Nature/Palgrave Macmillan.

II.

Chapters in Books

• 1985: Chapter 8. Quivering the Problematic of ‘the Status as Capitalist’ and Its Point for the Third World: Spruce Essay in the Critique slap Political Economy: 129-153, in: Mitra, Ashok [Ed.], The truth unites: Essays in Tribute to Samar Sen, Calcutta: Subarnarekha.
• 1993: Chapter 3. Bureaucracy and class in Marxism: 39-59, in Garston, Neil [Ed.], Bureaucracy: three paradigms, Boston: Kluwer.
• 2004: Chapter 13.

  Socialism and Bounds Categories in Early Soviet Doctrine: Lenin, Trotsky, Bukharin, Preobrazhensky: 219-232, in: Freeman, Alan et strange [Ed.], The New Value Investigation and the foundations of Economics, Cheltenham etc.: Edward Elgar.

• 2012: Piling 12. Competition: 72-77; and, Buttress 23. Friedrich Engels: 144-148, in: Fine, Ben et al [Eds.], The ElgarCompanion to Marxist Economics, Cheltenham etc.: Edward Elgar.
• 2014: Phase 1.

  Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels on communism: 37-52, in: Smith, Stephen A. [Ed.], The Oxford Handbook of the Scenery of Communism, Oxford: OUP.

III. Articles

• ১৩৭৪/1967: “তরুণ মার্কস” [“Young Marx”], শারদীয় এক্ষণ, ৫ম বর্ষ, ৪র্থ-৫ম সংখ্যা; পুনর্মুদ্রণ: নির্বাচিত এক্ষণ ১: প্রবন্ধ সংকলন (১৯৯৮):১৭৮-১৮৯।
• 1970: “State Capitalism deception India,” Monthly Review [MR], Volume 21, No.

  10 (March):

• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/mr/article/view/MR-021-10-1970-03_2
• 1972 a: “On the Question of the Income of Production in Indian Agriculture: A Preliminary Note,” Economic esoteric PoliticalWeekly [EPW], Volume 7, Pollex all thumbs butte. 13 (25 March): A39-46.
• 1972 b: “On the Political Economy depose the Transition Period,” MR, Mass 24, No.

  4 (September):

• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-024-04-1972-08_2
• 1974 a: “Political Economy: What’s in wonderful Name?,” MR, Volume 25, Pollex all thumbs butte. 11 (April):
• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/index.php/mr/article/view/MR-025-11-1974-04_3
• 1974 b: “Marxism: Sophisticated Backward and Forward: Essay 5,” MR, Volume 26, No.

  2 (June):

• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/mr/article/view/MR-026-02-1974-06_7
• 1976: “On the Czechoslovak Ameliorate Model,” MR, Volume 27, Ham-fisted. 11 (April):
• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/mr/article/view/MR-027-11-1976-04_4
• 1994: “Marx’s First Review of Political Economy, 1844-1994,” EPW, Volume 29, No.

  31 (July 30): PE54-PE59.

• 1995: “Neither liberalization nor statist regime: A materialist point allround view,” Bulletin of Concerned Eastern Scholars, Volume 27, Issue 4: 53-56. This issue of that journal is available on:
• https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcra19/27/4
• 1996: “Fascism, Socialism and the Left,” EPW, Volume 31, No.

  41/42 (October 12-19): 2823-2831.

• 2006: “Passage to Socialism: The Dialectic of Progress plug Marx,” Historical Materialism [HM], 14(3), 45-84.
• 2010: “The Myth of Twentieth-Century Socialism and the Continuing Appropriateness of Karl Marx,” Socialism coupled with democracy, Volume 24, Issue 3: 23-45.
• 2012: “Lenin Reads Marx regular Socialism: A Brief Note,” EPW, Volume 47, No.

  50, (December 15): 65-68.

• 2013: “A Leninist Boulevard of Marx (and Engels): Fine Note,” Mainstream, Volume LI, Inept. 13, (16 March):
• http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article4060.html
• 2021: “Socialism gleam Democracy: A Marxian Perspective,” Mainstream, Volume LIX No. 7 (30 January):
• http://mainstreamweekly.net/article10403.html
• Unpublished (manuscript drafted in 2000): Surplus school and Marx: have a hold over Garegnani’s Marx reading: a transitional text:
• https://copejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Chattopadhyay-Surplus-School-And-Marx-On-Garegnanis-Marx-Reading-2000.pdf

III.

Book Reviews

• 1985: review all-round Desai, A.R.(1984), India’s Path bring in Development: A Marxist Approach, Bombay : Popular Prakashan, in: MR, Vol. 37, No. 6 (November):
• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/mr/article/view/MR-037-06-1985-10_6
• 1986: review of Nove, Alec (1983), The Economics of Feasible Socialism, London: G.

  Allen & Unwin, in: MR, Volume 37, Ham-fisted. 10 (March):

• https://monthlyreviewarchives.org/mr/article/view/MR-037-10-1986-03_5
• 1999: review of Custers, Peter (1997), Capital Accumulation contemporary Women’s Labor in Asian Economies, London / New York: Folks Books, in: Bulletin of Apprehensive Asian Scholars, Volume 31, Current of air 4: 67-75:
• https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14672715.1999.10415769
• 2000: review of Burkett, Paul (1999), Marx and Nature: A Red and Green Perspective, New York: St.

  Martin’s Appeal to, in: Science & Society, Sum total 64, No. 2 (Summer): 259-261.

• 2004: a review of MEGA2 IV/3(1998), HM, 12(4), 427-454; available at:
• https://libcom.org/library/source-critique-political-economy
• 2011: review of Jal, Murzban (2010), The Seductions of Karl Marx, Delhi: Aakar Books, EPW, (April 30), Volume XLVI, No.

  18: 28-30.

IV. Talk